THE BULL: Fly under the radar?
Each year the Australian business magazine, BRW, publishes its list of the 100 fastest growing companies in Australia. It calls this the BRW Fast 100. The criterion for inclusion, for a business, is as follows:
- Minimum revenue of A$500k pa
- Fewer than 200 full time employees
- Entry forms must be signed by an external accountant or auditor.
Companies are ranked according to average revenue growth in the prior three years.
Essentially, it is a competition that companies choose to enter. BRW don’t enter companies in it. If you don’t send in an entry form, then you won’t be ranked.
One of the interesting facts about the 2009 list is that one-third of all companies had sales of less than $5m pa. A further 27% had sales between $5m and $10m pa. This means that approximately 60% of all businesses had sales of less than $10m pa –most on the list are therefore relatively small privately-owned businesses.
Is being on a fast growth list a good thing? On the surface it might appear to be. However, what does it actually do for you? Maybe getting some kudos improves your business profile – but does it generate new business or just put a target on your back? Do your customers and the market really care? On the flipside, I’m sure your competitors like reading about your growth and what your future plans are!
Two private companies that I was previously a co-owner of would have finished in the top 25 of the Fast 100 list on at least a couple of occasions (each) had we chosen to enter it. However, the fast growth that we were enjoying at the time stretched the capability and the capacity of the businesses to the limit.
Cash was being consumed quickly to fund our expansion plans and we had little room for error. We were focused on carving out market niches under the noses of our larger, more powerful competitors. These companies totally under-estimated us and that suited us fine. The more they ignored us the better. Eventually we just cruised past them and they couldn’t do anything about it. We had momentum and they didn’t. Both these companies became the market leader in their sector. Who knows if it would have been different if we had entered the Fast 100 competition and alerted the market to our progress? I wasn’t prepared to find out.
There is great power in choosing to fly under the radar versus promoting yourself in the mainstream business media. It depends on what is important to you. It might stroke your ego to see your name in the press but make sure it has a positive influence on your business. If it doesn’t, don’t do it! Self-interest and business are not a good combination.
Jim Collins, author of Good to Great, said it well “for leaders to make something great, their ambition has to be for the greatness of the work and the company, rather than for themselves. That doesn’t mean that they don’t have an ego. It means at each decision point – at each of the critical junctures when choice A would favour their ego and choice B would favour the company and the work – time and again the great leaders pick choice B. Celebrity CEOs, at those same decision points, are more likely to favour self and ego over company and work.” Sobering, isn’t it?
Have a great week!
The Bull
Latest posts by The Bull (see all)
- You get What you Tolerate… - May 13, 2013
- What do you Dislike in Business? - May 6, 2013
- It Pays to be Dogged - April 29, 2013
Comments
-
That absolutely strikes a chord with me. Definitely fly under the radar. I hate any publicity of our business model. Why make it easier for others to compete with you?
-
The first thing I will say is that the Fast 100 or any form of media coverage can be a very positive experience for a company, if handled properly. The decision to do it needs to be carefully considered.
The businesses that I was involved with were operating within sectors with entrenched market leaders who had grown lazy and complacent- this created the opportunity for us. If we kept quiet and systematically put in place our plans we figured that we could get to a point where we had built something meaningful, largely without being noticed. We ignored the media and anything else that would alert the market to our progress.
We had to do this because we had limited funds and any misstep would have been disastrous. Basically we kept our head down and when we came out the other end we had built a market position that was difficult to shift. James comments below suggest that bigger companies keep a watchful eye on Fast100 and other similar lists.
The flip side is that the media can be extremely useful to build your business in the right markets. For example, if the market is fragmented there might be good possibilities to enhance your brand via good use of the media .
Whatever you do, it is important to understand that media coverage can be extremely distracting (as per Chris, Martin T and Wolfgang’s comments below).If it doesn’t help you to progress your business plans then why do it? If it is about promoting people within the business and not the business itself – then don’t do it. Celebrity CEOs (see Jim Collins quote) are bad for business.
-
The problem a lot of the time is that ego gets in the way. CEOs start believing their own publicity and it goes to their head. They forget what is important and what is not.They start enjoying the media experience too much and pay less attention to the business. The Jim Collins quote sums it up beautifully.
-
We are a large retail business (400+) operating in four countries, including Australia. One of our smaller competitors (who we ignored) popped up in the Fast100 list last year for the first time. They also started to get a lot of press after this. What they do is different to what we do but it is probably a profitable market niche. Five months ago we started a project team to look further at this niche and understand it better. We also began researching our competitor much more closely and now have a very good perspective on their strengths and weaknesses. For example we know they are highly geared and therefore vulnerable to attack. The sector looks like a good opportunity to us and we will be committing capital to enter it within the next few months. We believe that with our geographic coverage and scale we will blow our smaller competitor away within two years. Without Fast100 we would have just have ignored them and missed this opportunity. With traction, our competitor may have hurt us down the track.They would have been better advised to fly under the radar!
As a side note, I really enjoy UWS – its a great blog. The bull provides a unique and challenging perspective every time he writes. On the current topic he has hit the nail on the head. Keep up the great work!
-
I was part of the Fast list in 2007… it was for the first 3 months the best things that ever happened to us however we certainly lost focus coming into 2008 on Media and exposure as apposed to quality and delivering the level of service we had delivered prior.
Our CEo lost his focus, we still exist but only just.
-
Good article. Fully agree with your view of flying under the radar. Getting underestimated is quite a sweet spot. Not sure how it is here, but in Germany I could observe over the years that the CEO of the year got fired the next. After a few years observation, I could make predictions and had a good probability rate. Cute, isn’t it?


Comments